X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045FDD8127 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:45:28 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37976-08 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:45:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC44DB69E for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:45:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA1DjUqf024846; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:45:30 -0500 (EST) To: Kelly Burkhart Cc: mark@mark.mielke.cc, Merlin Moncure , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 8.x index insert performance In-reply-to: <1130852029.7026.88.camel@krb06.tradebot.com> References: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD725@Herge.rcsinc.local> <20051031193547.GA3311@mark.mielke.cc> <18647.1130790629@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1130792391.7026.55.camel@krb06.tradebot.com> <19065.1130793527@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1130852029.7026.88.camel@krb06.tradebot.com> Comments: In-reply-to Kelly Burkhart message dated "Tue, 01 Nov 2005 07:33:49 -0600" Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 08:45:30 -0500 Message-ID: <24845.1130852730@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006] X-Spam-Score: 0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/5 X-Sequence-Number: 15262 Kelly Burkhart writes: > Tom, I'd be happy to profile the backend at several points in the run if > you think that would be helpful. What compiler flags should I use? Add -g -pg and leave the rest alone. Also, if you're on Linux note that you need -DLINUX_PROFILE. > It may be weekend by the time I get this done. Well, it's probably too late to think of tweaking 8.1 anyway... regards, tom lane