X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE56952921 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:28:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13450-01 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 04:28:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E7552926 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:28:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j574Sh2L025726; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:28:43 -0400 (EDT) To: Neil Conway Cc: Mark Rinaudo , postgres performance Subject: Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine In-reply-to: <42A4E0E0.5010601@samurai.com> References: <1118080420.1644.23.camel@penguin1> <22887.1118092521@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1118096900.1893.58.camel@penguin1> <42A4E0E0.5010601@samurai.com> Comments: In-reply-to Neil Conway message dated "Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:48:48 +1000" Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:28:43 -0400 Message-ID: <25725.1118118523@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/139 X-Sequence-Number: 12776 Neil Conway writes: > (From a Redhat POV, it would probably be a good idea to patch 7.3 to > include the relatively trivial changes needed for decent AMD64 > performance, How embarrassing :-( Will see about fixing it. However, this certainly won't ship before the next RHEL3 quarterly update, so in the meantime if Mark feels like building locally, it wouldn't be a bad idea. regards, tom lane