X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557069DCA30 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 01:49:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59719-06 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 01:49:45 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABF79DC85C for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 01:49:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k115nhYI025858; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 00:49:43 -0500 (EST) To: "Marc Morin" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: partitioning and locking problems In-reply-to: <2BCEB9A37A4D354AA276774EE13FB8C263B3DE@mailserver.sandvine.com> References: <2BCEB9A37A4D354AA276774EE13FB8C263B3DE@mailserver.sandvine.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Marc Morin" message dated "Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:25:01 -0500" Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:49:43 -0500 Message-ID: <25857.1138772983@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.102 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102] X-Spam-Score: 0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/5 X-Sequence-Number: 16991 "Marc Morin" writes: > Would like to understand the implications of changing postgres' > code/locking for rule changes and truncate to not require locking out > select statements? It won't work... regards, tom lane