X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969C99DC815 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:01:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14214-04 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:01:48 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5F69DC806 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:01:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1KF1k0c025934; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:01:46 -0500 (EST) To: Fredrik Olsson cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Force another plan. In-reply-to: <43F992D1.6040308@treyst.se> References: <43F74592.7010701@treyst.se> <20490.1140287811@sss.pgh.pa.us> <43F866E2.20001@treyst.se> <11673.1140370277@sss.pgh.pa.us> <43F992D1.6040308@treyst.se> Comments: In-reply-to Fredrik Olsson message dated "Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:58:41 +0100" Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:01:46 -0500 Message-ID: <25933.1140447706@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.11 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110] X-Spam-Score: 0.11 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/320 X-Sequence-Number: 17306 Fredrik Olsson writes: > Is a self contained test-case for the old way with the "proxy-view" is > still wanted? Yes, something still seems funny there. And for that matter it wasn't clear what was wrong with your proxy view, either. regards, tom lane