X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9B711F7DC0 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:31:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: 0.126 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.126 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k39hn0tLAqBl for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:31:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0823A11F732C for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:31:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3JFVJtk026520; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:31:19 -0400 (EDT) To: Scott Marlowe cc: Markus Schaber , Magnus Hagander , Pgsql performance Subject: Re: Inserts optimization? In-reply-to: <1145460130.23538.119.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA352AE@algol.sollentuna.se> <44462849.3070209@logix-tt.com> <1145460130.23538.119.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Comments: In-reply-to Scott Marlowe message dated "Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:22:10 -0500" Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:31:19 -0400 Message-ID: <26519.1145460679@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200604/430 X-Sequence-Number: 18514 Scott Marlowe writes: > It's the refusal of people to stop using MyISAM table types that's the > real issue. Isn't MyISAM still the default over there? It's hardly likely that the average MySQL user would use anything but the default table type ... regards, tom lane