Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DF6633361
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 17:58:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 32616-03
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 20:58:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50B1633063
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 17:58:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o62KwjNr027343;
	Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:58:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? 
In-reply-to: <201007022053.o62Kri520462@momjian.us> 
References: <201007022053.o62Kri520462@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:53:44 -0400"
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:58:45 -0400
Message-ID: <27342.1278104325@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201007/35
X-Sequence-Number: 39424

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I am surprised there is no documentation update requirement for this.

Somebody put something about it in the docs a few days ago, IIRC.

			regards, tom lane