X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9689FA29E for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:13:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33275-07 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:13:36 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9849FA25B for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:13:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8HNDXE3027955; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:13:33 -0400 (EDT) To: "Milen Kulev" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Partition elimination problem In-reply-to: <002201c6daa6$6057a220$0a00a8c0@trivadis.com> References: <002201c6daa6$6057a220$0a00a8c0@trivadis.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Milen Kulev" message dated "Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:12:33 +0200" Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:13:32 -0400 Message-ID: <27954.1158534812@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.104 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/222 X-Sequence-Number: 20908 "Milen Kulev" writes: > My Problem is that I don't see partiotion elimination feature (Parameer = > constraint_exclusion is ON): Your example works as expected for me. You *sure* you have constraint_exclusion turned on? regards, tom lane