X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BEA9FA6B1 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:06:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74620-02 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:06:26 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3189FA6B0 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:06:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k58G6PUi028436; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:06:25 -0400 (EDT) To: Andreas Pflug cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: JOIN with inherited table ignores indexes In-reply-to: <44880CB1.90307@pse-consulting.de> References: <44880CB1.90307@pse-consulting.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andreas Pflug message dated "Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:40:33 +0200" Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:06:25 -0400 Message-ID: <28435.1149782785@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/91 X-Sequence-Number: 19448 Andreas Pflug writes: > Any explanation for this horror? Existing releases aren't smart about planning joins to inheritance trees. CVS HEAD is better... regards, tom lane