X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114089FA5BE for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:18:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17398-02 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:18:29 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B4D9FA13E for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:18:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5FGIQLj028744; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:18:26 -0400 (EDT) To: "jody brownell" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? In-reply-to: <200606151312.37853.jody.brownell@q1labs.com> References: <200606141618.37849.jody.brownell@q1labs.com> <200606150901.19201.jody.brownell@q1labs.com> <28419.1150386248@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200606151312.37853.jody.brownell@q1labs.com> Comments: In-reply-to "jody brownell" message dated "Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:12:37 -0300" Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:18:26 -0400 Message-ID: <28743.1150388306@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/311 X-Sequence-Number: 19668 "jody brownell" writes: > BTW - the fix you mentioned .... is that targeted for 8.2? Is there a timeline for 8.2? There is no fix as yet, but it's on the radar screen to fix for 8.2. We expect 8.2 will go beta towards the end of summer (I forget whether Aug 1 or Sep 1 is the target). regards, tom lane