Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDA46340AE for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:40:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05409-05 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:40:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C8A632539 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:40:32 -0400 (AST) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3300532bwz.3 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:40:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XlLXUiFwZGhwmvAuc9tiTi2MarbLxNJ9wdm9NlmpueA=; b=NJxH/I65B0prLHUSDNW2E1jmclxftDtm+tCayRDNxJrwMuAKnbTEmzqOU43fTA0yQK rX/wiCzjCr6IhqF63I5LHQSlLbJour4rjtKaSvsPpk7IpJeWxVEUQLBVuFOZVINs0KMY TxArmX9s7ngGboViZSRu0KYzQESt9oHkNkfvI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=yHunMP9BTGRWqJU0G05JaLNzvL0yG481eKTJ6ltDgEVdloP609M8SPeZSGaLTRheua ++I+Cgpo8Vbk/e7biShw+sD3ZwTgACx3JBcJvmrm1amsLY9SroJBgn4xUJCgwf9hqLQo OiPyT2O2J846UFRlp5JD2eIJg9xPngW5FhPhk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.135 with SMTP id p7mr8178490bkp.69.1257756030308; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:40:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <603c8f070911081958sbac9712k15f50b80e5419d3c@mail.gmail.com> References: <008801ca6021$c1cc7630$45656290$@com> <18869.1257650960@sss.pgh.pa.us> <009601ca6030$0e731440$2b593cc0$@com> <603c8f070911081958sbac9712k15f50b80e5419d3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:40:30 +0000 Message-ID: <2f4958ff0911090040v11389c9dud0787b0de4836a2a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE slowing down significantly over time From: =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= To: Robert Haas Cc: Aris Samad-Yahaya , Tom Lane , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325556ce666d1930477ec2507 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.598 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200911/86 X-Sequence-Number: 36254 --000325556ce666d1930477ec2507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > > > And maybe REINDEX, too. yup, nevermind the mess in table, indices are getting fscked much quicker than table it self, because of its structure. -- GJ --000325556ce666d1930477ec2507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Robert H= aas <robertmh= aas@gmail.com> wrote:

And maybe REINDEX, too.

yup, nevermin= d the mess in table, indices are getting fscked much quicker than table it = self, because of its structure.=C2=A0
=C2=A0



--
GJ
--000325556ce666d1930477ec2507--