X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D727C53FE5 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:06:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42263-10 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:06:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6B753FD8 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:06:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3ME6XU0000330; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:06:33 -0400 (EDT) To: David Roussel Cc: Bill Chandler , pgsql-perform Subject: Re: Index bloat problem? In-reply-to: <869771629a1d24a91b8df779f7cddfe9@diroussel.xsmail.com> References: <20050421170018.2998.qmail@web51403.mail.yahoo.com> <27013.1114149431@sss.pgh.pa.us> <869771629a1d24a91b8df779f7cddfe9@diroussel.xsmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to David Roussel message dated "Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:44:05 +0100" Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:06:33 -0400 Message-ID: <329.1114178793@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.007 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/614 X-Sequence-Number: 12011 David Roussel writes: > |dave_data_update_events r 1593600.0 40209 > |dave_data_update_events_event_id_key i 1912320.0 29271 Hmm ... what PG version is this, and what does VACUUM VERBOSE on that table show? regards, tom lane