X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C522252C62 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:10:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34050-08 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:10:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA3252AAB for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:10:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so15167wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lk0S0F4WVvCDkaZpyFc/JWM34Rji2UyoGA5eYne5Qw9lJHbrjAe2QhasvJhLVzAJjt8ZyCeBqmyBuINZh8jUh7TxLM1bxZrgIEpWqcPt6cQept5ndnjPEpWiRilrbIfxyGr/LkzMjENoYL3YcUQmOi+PUsyBpBDW2hP/pTZeO7k= Received: by 10.54.116.17 with SMTP id o17mr36668wrc; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.86.15 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <33c6269f0507261210400dff27@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:10:11 -0400 From: Alex Turner Reply-To: Alex Turner To: PFC Subject: Re: Cheap RAM disk? Cc: John A Meinel , Postgresql Performance In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E6661D.3060304@arbash-meinel.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.107 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/398 X-Sequence-Number: 13639 Please see: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=3DN82E16820145309 and http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=3DN82E16820145416 The price of Reg ECC is not significantly higher than regular ram at this point. Plus if you go with super fast 2-2-2-6 then it's actualy more than good ol 2.5 Reg ECC. Alex Turner NetEconomist On 7/26/05, PFC wrote: >=20 > > I'm a little leary as it is definitely a version 1.0 product (it is > > still using an FPGA as the controller, so they were obviously pushing t= o > > get the card into production). >=20 > Not necessarily. FPGA's have become a sensible choice now. My RME= studio > soundcard uses a big FPGA. >=20 > The performance in the test doesn't look that good, though, but d= on't > forget it was run under windows. For instance they get 77s to copy the > Firefox source tree on their Athlon 64/raptor ; my Duron / 7200rpm ide > drive does it in 30 seconds, but not with windows of course. >=20 > However it doesnt' use ECC so... That's a pity, because they coul= d have > implemented ECC in "software" inside the chip, and have the benefits of > error correction with normal, cheap RAM. >=20 > Well; wait and see... >=20 > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend >