X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C769DC87F for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:17:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05247-09 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:17:09 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.206]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6E19DC9A9 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:17:05 -0400 (AST) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s2so6018uge for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:17:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PiChSjjtBXvRG1sTrZSz9jSloKTMp3Fc8LsP2o5wOIl5ohTFpyZ8VdxCh/Qls/KJ3buuR4MpHzrmqUwibeToPn+GCdgpsgwwWVksQc2ejcMPkV6ydYcyxVEMDr1jPO+W+uO9+zSN8T2e4UBhp5XHf4hp0Sgn5hnGxKt+PNgf9KY= Received: by 10.66.249.17 with SMTP id w17mr2725249ugh; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.22.1 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:17:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <33c6269f0601181117j10bdeb27ke733c9b032e22cbc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:17:04 -0500 From: Alex Turner To: Benjamin Arai Subject: Re: 3WARE Card performance boost? Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <00ee01c61c5a$5db2c870$d7cc178a@uni> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <00ee01c61c5a$5db2c870$d7cc178a@uni> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.786 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.546, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.332] X-Spam-Score: 0.786 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/308 X-Sequence-Number: 16786 A 3ware card will re-order your writes to put them more in disk order, which will probably improve performance a bit, but just going from a software RAID 1 to a hardware RAID 1, I would not imagine that you will see much of a performance boost. Really to get better performance you will need to add more drives, or faster drives. If you are currently running 7200 RPM consumer drives, going to a 10000RPM WD Raptor drive will probably increase performance by about 30%, again not all that much. Alex On 1/18/06, Benjamin Arai wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently doing large weekly updates with fsync=3Doff. My updates > involves SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE and etc. Setting fsync=3Doff works for m= e > since I take a complete backup before the weekly update and run a "sync" = and > "CHECKPOINT" after each weekly update has completed to ensure the data is > all written to disk. > > Obviously, I have done this to improve write performance for the update e= ach > week. My question is if I install a 3ware or similar card to replace my > current software RAID 1 configuration, am I going to see a very large > improvement? If so, what would be a ball park figure? > > > Benjamin Arai > barai@cs.ucr.edu > http://www.benjaminarai.com >