Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338262E0032 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:04:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07425-04 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:04:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABBB2E0084 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:04:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3IH3wCq003631; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:03:58 -0400 (EDT) To: "Jeffrey Baker" cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 3-days-long vacuum of 20GB table In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Jeffrey Baker" message dated "Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:35:42 -0700" Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:03:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3630.1208538238@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/270 X-Sequence-Number: 29763 "Jeffrey Baker" writes: > This autovacuum has been hammering my server with purely random i/o > for half a week. The table is only 20GB and the i/o subsystem is good > for 250MB/s sequential and a solid 5kiops. When should I expect it to > end (if ever)? What have you got maintenance_work_mem set to? Which PG version exactly? regards, tom lane