Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A202E007C
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:58:02 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 76782-05 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:57:59 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com
 [209.85.128.185])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14A32E0057
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:57:59 -0400 (AST)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so4944387fka.3
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:57:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	bh=0G+Imbv6+ZM2oNP+FCM8hv9AtJ4rHzU4VCttR+0jGY4=;
	b=DTRkhA//qMTCUJA+WGSJpsG66FzJQ+PUtVWRIWhLljYZLjf6qWHmTAdG0MbY/hPt1ZDsrhUPL7GbjE4Whm5ilH99daRwMSiYfqDvgOLnq00OmcsmRZHbBVTZ9CHZ6kzDWf9eH8HhaF0PgEQgq6PsYQetMJpax72LPx/DsboOkuE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=DNUDjD30WAQOTuzRHTgYKLFXfkiK1ax7ODDSHBplMAhmVL2PtShc8316fqay5C7EZXnhgpxE10KlXfmipjmlOvnQkHGaFVZ8/KQv0htVK5qTIA1hsfAv3zycHaa5Bq3Oj7ej58pzWhbr2MIR0gBTMSsJ4MM0jAR6XUG90+FkBSE=
Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr18474084bue.5.1204286275665;
	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:57:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.113.9 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:57:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <36af4bed0802290357v39b858a9n78c1002ad1bab0dd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:27:55 +0530
From: "Robins Tharakan" <tharakan@gmail.com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: Bypassing useless ORDER BY in a VIEW
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <8366.1204218820@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_26256_32410846.1204286275445"
References: <36af4bed0802280631ja29c636w2256fb329e14b95e@mail.gmail.com>
	<8366.1204218820@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200802/397
X-Sequence-Number: 28939

------=_Part_26256_32410846.1204286275445
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Frankly put, i didn't know that this perspective exists and then thanks for
putting it that way then !!

Guess I should take a relook at how I plan to use those VIEWS.

Thanks
*Robins*


> A rule of thumb is that ORDER BY in a view is bad design, IMHO.
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

------=_Part_26256_32410846.1204286275445
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br>Frankly put, i didn&#39;t know that this perspective exists and then thanks for putting it that way then !!<br><br>Guess I should take a relook at how I plan to use those VIEWS.<br><br>Thanks<br><b>Robins</b><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
A rule of thumb is that ORDER BY in a view is bad design, IMHO.<br>
<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;regards, tom lane<br>
</blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_26256_32410846.1204286275445--