Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DEB9FB395 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:58:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00407-07 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:58:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD9E9FA197 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:58:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8TLwqP2004105; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:58:52 -0400 (EDT) To: gurkan@resolution.com cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: cont. how to optimize postgres 8.1 In-reply-to: <1159565772.451d91cc1d4ce@www.resolution.com> References: <1159565772.451d91cc1d4ce@www.resolution.com> Comments: In-reply-to gurkan@resolution.com message dated "Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:36:12 -0400" Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:58:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4104.1159567132@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200609/439 X-Sequence-Number: 21125 gurkan@resolution.com writes: > How do I optimize postgres8.1? 8 msec for a five-way join doesn't sound out of line to me. What were you expecting? regards, tom lane