X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A9A329C6B for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:36:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86735-07 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:36:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B228A329C63 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:36:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8C9aKCn089212 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:36:20 GMT (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i8C97Y99084176 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:07:34 GMT From: Gaetano Mendola X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.performance Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:07:34 +0200 Organization: PYRENET Midi-pyrenees Provider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <414411D6.2070208@bigfoot.com> References: <20040912042442.49915.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@pyrenet.fr To: Mark Cotner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20040912042442.49915.qmail@web41508.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/77 X-Sequence-Number: 8205 Mark Cotner wrote: > Requirements: > Merge table definition equivalent. We use these > extensively. What do you mean with "merge table definition equivalent"? Regards Gaetano Mendola