X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFB5533F9 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:36:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64766-09 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 15:36:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC205336E for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:36:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (clbb-248.saw.net [64.146.135.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3NFUEma015316; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:30:14 -0700 Message-ID: <426A6B58.5070506@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:35:52 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Fradkin Cc: "'Jim C. Nasby'" , "'Alvaro Herrera'" , "'Andreas Pflug'" , "'Dave Page'" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, ac@wazagua.com, wheyliger@wazagua.com, "'Steve Hatt'" Subject: Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon References: <001701c5480e$57e7fad0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> In-Reply-To: <001701c5480e$57e7fad0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.036 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/644 X-Sequence-Number: 12041 Joel Fradkin wrote: > I would very, very strongly encourage you to run multi-user tests before > deciding on mysql. Mysql is nowhere near as capable when it comes to > concurrent operations as PostgreSQL is. From what others have said, it > doesn't take many concurrent operations for it to just fall over. I > can't speak from experience because I avoid mysql like the plague, > though. :) > > I am just testing the water so to speak, if it cant handle single user tests > then multiple user tests are kind of a waste of time. Joel I think you are missing the point on the above comment. The above comment as I read is, o.k. you are having problems with PostgreSQL BUT MySQL isn't going to help you and you will see that in multi-user tests. MySQL is known to work very well on small databases without a lot of concurrent sessions. I don't think anybody here would argue that. Where MySQL runs into trouble is larger databases with lots of concurrent connections. > I am a little disappointed I have not understood enough to get my analyzer > to use the proper plan, we had to set seqscan off to get the select from > response_line to work fast and I had to turn off merge joins to get assoc > list to work fast. Once I am up I can try to learn more about it, I am so > glad there are so many folks here willing to take time to educate us newb's. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake Command Prompt, Inc. > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org