X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F4253DE5 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:59:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42018-05 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:59:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.169.223]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FC9753DE0 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:59:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.161?) (apoc9009@84.56.236.162 with plain) by smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 09:58:54 -0000 Message-ID: <426E108D.7000503@yahoo.de> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:57:33 +0200 From: "apoc9009@yahoo.de" Reply-To: apoc9009@yahoo.de Organization: apoc9009@yahoo.de User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future? References: <426DF6C5.1090509@yahoo.de> <426DFA43.5080801@archonet.com> In-Reply-To: <426DFA43.5080801@archonet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.864 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/695 X-Sequence-Number: 12092 Hmm, I have asked some Peoples on the List an some one has posted this links http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-12/msg00101.php It is quite usefull to read but iam not sure thadt theese Trick is verry helpfull. I want to splitt my 1GByte Table into some little Partitions but how should i do thadt? With the ORACLE Partitioning Option, i can Configurering my Table withe Enterprise Manager or SQL Plus but in this case it looks like Trap. Should i really decrease my Tabledata size and spread them to other Tables with the same Structure by limiting Records??? The next Problem i see, how should i do a Insert/Update/Delete on 4 Tables of the same Structure at one Query??? No missunderstanding. We talking not about normalization or restructuring the Colums of a table. We talking about Partitioning and in this case at Postgres (emultation of Partitioning wir UNIONS for Performance tuning).. Josh