X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3D553B01
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  8 May 2005 15:15:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 12964-08
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  8 May 2005 18:15:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A6953B05
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  8 May 2005 15:15:20 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 30089 invoked by uid 10); 8 May 2005 18:15:20 -0000
Received: (vexira-qq 30082-5E8C4A11 invoked from network) 08 May 2005 20:15:20
	+0200
Received: from unknown (HELO [81.58.65.37]) ([81.58.65.37])
	(envelope-sender <iddekingej@lycos.com>)
	by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for < >; 8 May 2005 18:15:20 -0000
Message-ID: <427E736A.4030107@lycos.com>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 20:15:38 +0000
From: Jeroen van Iddekinge <iddekingej@lycos.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: sequence scan on PK
References: <427E2941.9070105@lycos.com> <427E17BC.7050407@arbash-meinel.com>
	<427E5130.7020702@lycos.com> <427E3BE6.5040702@beccati.com>
	<427E5B2E.7020001@lycos.com> <427E46C7.1080208@beccati.com>
In-Reply-To: <427E46C7.1080208@beccati.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.16; VAE: 6.30.0.2;
	VDF: 6.30.0.11; host: postbode02.zonnet.nl)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.339 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL,
	DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200505/84
X-Sequence-Number: 12248

Matteo Beccati wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> Yes , it was a bit to high (18) so a lowered it. It speeded up some 
>> pages for about 5%.
>
>
> 18? The default is 4 if I can remember correctly. I wonder if your db 
> has ever seen an index scan ;)
>

I was expermenting how much some setting influence has on the perfomance 
of some web application.
So I think i forgot to change the setting back and got some strange 
query plans.

Thanks
Jer