X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5155280A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:22:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79299-04 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:22:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ebrsrv01.ebravo.it (host53-205.pool8534.interbusiness.it [85.34.205.53]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFCA52806 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:22:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.11.103] ([192.168.11.103]) (authenticated) by ebrsrv01.ebravo.it (8.11.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id j51AMCY20850; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:22:12 +0200 Message-ID: <429D8C50.6080207@streppone.it> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:22:08 +0200 From: Cosimo Streppone User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: it, it-it, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Cc: Postgresql Performance Subject: Re: postgresql-8.0.1 performance tuning References: <1117201312.7060.6.camel@fandelm.ecommit.de> <429D47FD.7090501@streppone.it> <20050601095754.GA24585@uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20050601095754.GA24585@uio.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.05 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/12 X-Sequence-Number: 12650 Steinar wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:30:37AM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > > > > fsync = true > > false > > Just setting fsync=false without considering the implications is a _bad_ > idea... I totally agree on that. -- Cosimo