X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE32F528A8 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:16:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26187-04 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:16:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf32.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf32.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.156]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A5852806 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:16:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.149]) by mxsf32.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5NCGJgx030326 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:16:19 -0400 Received: from pc-68-118-180-13.will.ct.charter.com (HELO [192.168.116.102]) (68.118.180.13) by mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2005 08:16:19 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,223,1115006400"; d="scan'208"; a="1166178772:sNHT16051300" Message-ID: <42BAA816.2040806@NarrowPathInc.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:16:22 -0400 From: Keith Worthington Reply-To: KeithW@NarrowPathInc.com Organization: Narrow Path, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radu.popescu@aldratech.com Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Article References: <20050622095227.05938982.frank@wiles.org> <200506221016.03808.josh@agliodbs.com> <20050622124232.71b05e3f.frank@wiles.org> <42BA1F01.1010700@NarrowPathInc.com> <42BA7F49.6080101@aldratech.com> In-Reply-To: <42BA7F49.6080101@aldratech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.046 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/449 X-Sequence-Number: 13086 Radu-Adrian Popescu wrote: >> >> There have been problems with Xeon processors. >> > > Can you elaborate on that please ? > > Thanks, Not really as I do not understand the issue. Here is one post from the archives. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-05/msg00441.php If you search the archives for xeon sooner or later you will bump into something relevant. -- Kind Regards, Keith