X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A23DA735
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:36:19 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 94557-10
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:36:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de
	[212.227.126.183])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B874D9EF7
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:36:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from p548F1E2F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.143.30.47]
	(helo=pse.dyndns.org)
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0ML2ov-1ERQTd0srO-0000j8; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:36:13 +0200
Received: from p548f2989.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.143.41.137]
	helo=[10.10.11.120])
	by pse.dyndns.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44)
	id 1ERQTb-0007u3-FM; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:36:11 +0200
Message-ID: <43536167.1010305@pse-consulting.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:31:35 +0200
From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NSO <nso@fmf.vtu.lt>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bytea poor performance
References: <17260.81.7.89.65.1129382454.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt>
	<29778.1129391647@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<18133.81.7.89.65.1129392990.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt>
	<4351DCB6.3040307@paradise.net.nz>
	<23627.81.7.89.65.1129460506.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt>
	<4352C113.80104@pse-consulting.de>
	<3311.85.206.197.88.1129500120.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt>
In-Reply-To: <3311.85.206.197.88.1129500120.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de
	login:0ce7ee5c3478b8d72edd8e05ccd40b70
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.058 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.784,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.655, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137]
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200510/251
X-Sequence-Number: 15019

NSO wrote:

>Well, no. Delphi isn't better, same time just for downloading data... But
>as I told before, if for ex. pgAdminIII is running on server machine it is
>a lot faster, I do not know why, I was monitoring network connection
>between client and server and it is using only up to 2% of full speed.. is
>server can't send faster? or client is not accepting data faster?
>  
>

Only the first number is relevant and subject to network/db/server 
issues. The second is GUI only.

Regards,
Andreas