X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD949DC847
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:30:35 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 32507-09
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:30:36 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from mail.logix-tt.com (serval.logix-tt.com [213.239.221.42])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1959DC813
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:30:30 -0400 (AST)
Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Mddbe.m.pppool.de
	[89.49.221.190])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B433C24400F;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:30:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A071F18189FA6;
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:30:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <43D4CC67.9050703@logix-tt.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:30:31 +0100
From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
Organization: Logical Tracking and Tracing International AG, Switzerland
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Marcos <mjs_ops@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
References: <43D130EF.3010205@zg.htnet.hr>	
	<20060120191031.GO20182@pervasive.com>
	<43D13C2F.1030203@zg.htnet.hr>	
	<20060120213455.GT20182@pervasive.com>
	<1138004054.949.10.camel@servidor>
In-Reply-To: <1138004054.949.10.camel@servidor>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.124 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124]
X-Spam-Score: 0.124
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200601/411
X-Sequence-Number: 16889

Hi, Marcos,

Marcos wrote:

> This one was my doubt, perhaps in based desktop applications this is
> true, but in web applications this is not the re-connecting is
> constant :(.

If this is true, then you have a much bigger performance problem than
query plan preparation.

You really should consider using a connection pool (most web application
servers provide pooling facilities) or some other means to keep the
connection between several http requests.

Worried,
Markus

-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org