X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B279DC9E1 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:30:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32649-08 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:30:20 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.rentalia.net (mail.rentalia.com [213.192.209.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7469D9DC960 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:30:16 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 14411 invoked by uid 514); 10 Mar 2006 11:26:46 +0100 Received: from 62.37.216.137 by rigodon (envelope-from , uid 512) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1284. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(62.37.216.137):SA:0(-1.3/5.0):. Processed in 3.864244 secs); 10 Mar 2006 10:26:46 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: ruben@rentalia.com via rigodon X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(62.37.216.137):SA:0(-1.3/5.0):. Processed in 3.864244 secs Process 14397) Received: from 62-37-216-137.mad1.adsl.uni2.es (HELO ?192.168.2.28?) (ruben@rentalia.com@62.37.216.137) by mail.rentalia.net with SMTP; 10 Mar 2006 11:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: <44115521.1040805@rentalia.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:29:53 +0100 From: Ruben Rubio Rey User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051011) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Query time References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.096 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096] X-Spam-Score: 0.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/116 X-Sequence-Number: 17553 There is not possibility to use another database. It's the best option I have seen. We have been working in postgres in last 3 years, and this is the first problem I have seen. (The database is working in a large website, 6.000 visits per day in a dedicated server) Any other idea? Chethana, Rao (IE10) wrote: >USUALLY POSTGRES DATABASE TAKES MORE TIME, COMPARED TO OTHER DATABASES. >HOWEVER U CAN FINETUNE THE PERFORMANCE OF POSTGRESQL. >IF U HAVE AN OPTION GO FOR SQLITE, MYSQL OR FIREBIRD. > >-----Original Message----- >From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org >[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ruben Rubio >Rey >Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:06 AM >To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org >Subject: [PERFORM] Query time > >Hi, > >I think im specting problems with a 7.4.8 postgres database. > >Sometimes some big query takes between 5 to 15 seconds. It happens >sometimes all the day it does not depend if database is busy. > >I have measured that sentence in 15 - 70 ms in normal circunstances. > >Why sometimes its takes too much time? >How can I fix it? >Is a postgres version problem, database problem or query problem? > >Any ideas will be apreciatted. > >Ruben Rubio > > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > > > >