X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057C011F71D5 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:33:04 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: 0.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.103 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.103] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AE8Bsc+RQQAg for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:32:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6612611F7042 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:33:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IXZ00HZXYYZK5@linda-5.paradise.net.nz> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:33:00 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-29-147.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.29.147]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075CC145265; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:32:58 +1200 (NZST) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:32:53 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Inserts optimization? In-reply-to: <4446DED2.3040307@calorieking.com> To: Christopher Kings-Lynne Cc: Tom Lane , Scott Marlowe , Markus Schaber , Magnus Hagander , Pgsql performance Message-id: <4446E4C5.90400@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA352AE@algol.sollentuna.se> <44462849.3070209@logix-tt.com> <1145460130.23538.119.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <26519.1145460679@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4446DED2.3040307@calorieking.com> X-Archive-Number: 200604/435 X-Sequence-Number: 18519 Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >> Scott Marlowe writes: >>> It's the refusal of people to stop using MyISAM table types that's the >>> real issue. >> >> Isn't MyISAM still the default over there? It's hardly likely that the >> average MySQL user would use anything but the default table type ... > > Since MySQL 5, InnoDB tables are default I recall. Might be for the binaries from www.mysql.com - but if you build from source, it still seems to be MYISAM (checked with 5.0.18 and 5.1.7 here). Cheers Mark