Message-ID: <444DFC8D.9060801@archonet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:40:13 +0100
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ramasamy <ramasamy.p@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Postgresql Performance' <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: security for row level but not based on Database user's
References: <1145615328.300612.56380@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>	
	<444DEE78.7020703@archonet.com>
	<dd5258f00604250300h2550e7b2w19bb9310bf89510f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <dd5258f00604250300h2550e7b2w19bb9310bf89510f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ramasamy wrote:
> Hi Richard ,
>  Very good Day. Great information that you given to me.

Great glad you think it's useful. Oh, don't forget to cc: the 
mailing-list - that's the convention around here.

> I will try in your idea. Here I am using SQL server 2000(Even I can use SQL
> Sever 2005 too if needed.) We are dealing with lot of databases with lot of
> business logic. I think your information will great for me.

Ah - you're not using PostgreSQL? Well, the principle is the same but 
you should be aware that this is a PostgreSQL list so the details will 
be different.

> Let I try and I will back with you.
> 
> Thanks and hands of too you.
> 
> But i don't have any idea of getting Session from databases (I think you are
> meaning that user can be handle with session). If you have some more idea
> then it will be great full to me.

With MS-SQL you'll probably want to look at T-SQL variables, although I 
don't know if they last longer than a single transaction. Failing that, 
functions or temporary tables might be a help.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd