X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC959FA3A6; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:54:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01097-05; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:54:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.logix-tt.com (unknown [212.211.145.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5479FA2FA; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:54:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (p549D13DA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.157.19.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484CB65837; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1050518222EEA; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461F0A3.60102@logix-tt.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:54:43 +0200 From: Markus Schaber Organization: Logical Tracking and Tracing International AG, Switzerland User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PostgreSQL General Cc: "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid References: <473FC220-A52C-4954-81E9-A14ED33164C2@blighty.com> <4460BA8B.7010600@commandprompt.com> <4F853BBA-175C-4B3E-BAF4-AA34B80DF6EF@blighty.com> <4460DED4.2090103@commandprompt.com> <7779142C-B027-4C17-A67C-A7C220AADF80@slamb.org> In-Reply-To: <7779142C-B027-4C17-A67C-A7C220AADF80@slamb.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/428 X-Sequence-Number: 95220 Hi, Scott & all, Scott Lamb wrote: > I don't know the answer to this question, but have you seen this tool? > > http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html We had a simpler tool inhouse, which wrote a file byte-for-byte, and called fsync() after every byte. If the number of fsyncs/min is higher than your rotations per minute value of your disks, they must be lying. It does not find as much liers as the script above, but it is less intrusive (can be ran on every low-io machine without crashing it), and it found some liers in-house (some notebook disks, one external USB/FireWire to IDE case, and an older linux cryptoloop implementations, IIRC). If you're interested, I can dig for the C source... HTH, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org