X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E849D9FA13E for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13935-10 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:29 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from skunk.mtbrook.bozemanpass.com (unknown [69.145.82.195]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C17C9F9316 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:11:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [69.145.82.218] (unknown [69.145.82.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skunk.mtbrook.bozemanpass.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46FD5582B6 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <448F0DE0.50509@boreham.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:11:28 -0600 From: David Boreham Reply-To: david_list@boreham.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? References: <1150221760.12191.25.camel@amd64-gentoo-laptop> <1150225202.29299.51.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> In-Reply-To: <1150225202.29299.51.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/194 X-Sequence-Number: 19551 >My suggestion is to look at something like this: > >http://www.abmx.com/1u-supermicro-amd-opteron-rackmount-server-p-210.html > >1U rackmount opteron from Supermicro that can have two dual core >opterons and 4 drives and up to 16 gigs of ram. Supermicro server >motherboards have always treated me well and performed well too. > > I've had good experience with similar machines from Tyan : http://www.tyan.com/products/html/gt24b2891.html