X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9FB9FA13E for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:55:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33691-03 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:55:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from planetmail2.outgw.tn (planetmail2.outgw.tn [193.95.28.39]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68CF9F9316 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:55:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from smtp2.planet.net.tn (smtp-in.planet.tn [193.95.123.26]) Received: from MailGateway.planettunisie.com ([193.95.123.23]) by smtp2.planet.net.tn (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k5DLOjcn023697 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:24:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] ([196.203.226.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by MailGateway.planettunisie.com with ESMTP id k5DLPpaT016184 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:25:51 GMT Message-ID: <448F2D1C.7090301@planet.tn> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:24:44 +0200 From: Zydoon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: scaling up postgres References: <200606030931.k539V38Y007877@smtp2.planet.net.tn> <20060603094355.GA23297@uio.no> <1150062140.23423.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <448D3B65.7090709@aeccom.com> <448DE0DB.1020107@planet.tn> <1150226929.29299.54.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <20060613203824.7bca92bf.gdh@laterooms.com> In-Reply-To: <20060613203824.7bca92bf.gdh@laterooms.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=8BE92B3F; url=hkp://subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/213 X-Sequence-Number: 19570 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gavin Hamill wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:28:49 -0500 > Scott Marlowe wrote: > >> Search the performance archives for the last 4 or 5 months for PPC / >> pseries machines. >> >> You'll find a very long thread about the disappointing performance the >> tester got with a rather expensive P Series machine. And his happy >> ending of testing on an Opteron machine. > > Amen, brother :) > > We hoped throwing a silly pSeries 650 would solve all our problems. Boy > were we wrong... a world of pain... > > Don't go there - just buy an Opteron system - if you're talking about > IBM big iron, a decent Opteron will cost you about as much as a couple > of compilers and an on-site visit from IBM... > > Cheers, > Gavin. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > Things cannot be clearer :) I really know that opterons are the best I can have. But for now I have to publish the results Sunday 25th on either the xeons or the PPCs. Tomorrow I'll conduct a deeper test, and come back. Cheers. - -- Zied Fakhfakh GPG Key : gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys F06B55B5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEjy0cS1DO7ovpKz8RAklqAKDC75a8SQUoGwNHGxu4ysZhNt5eJwCgt0mP YHfZbYVS44kxFyxxEzs9KE0= =aLbn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----