X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55859FB2D5 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:03:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80529-02 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:03:13 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A9A9FB2CD for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:02:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6TH1d3P005093; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:01:39 -0700 Message-ID: <44CB9472.9060206@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:01:38 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjen van der Meijden CC: Jochem van Dieten , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1 References: <44CB7896.8030501@oli.tudelft.nl> <44CB8235.9070903@commandprompt.com> <44CB8DC1.4040105@tweakers.net> In-Reply-To: <44CB8DC1.4040105@tweakers.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.151 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200607/282 X-Sequence-Number: 20142 Arjen van der Meijden wrote: > On 29-7-2006 17:43, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >> I would love to get my hands on that postgresql version and see how >> much farther it could be optimized. > > You probably mean the entire installation? As said in my reply to > Jochem, I've spent a few days testing all queries to improve their > performance. I'm not sure what kind of improvements that yielded, but if > I remember correctly its in the order of 3-5 times for the entire > benchmark, compared to the initial MySQL-layout and queries. > > If you mean the configuration and which version it was, I can look that > up for you if you'd like. Including the compilation switches used on the > T2000. Well I would be curious about the postgresql.conf and how much ram etc... it had. > Then again, we regularly have other server hardware on which the same > database is used, so even without the T2000 we could still do some > effort to further improve postgresql's performance. > It might be interesting to have some Postgres experts do some more > tuning and allowing MySQL AB to do the same... But I'm not sure if we're > willing to spent that much extra time on a benchmark (just testing one > database costs us about a day and a half...) I understand, I just have a feeling that we could do even better :) I do appreciate all your efforts. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Best regards, > > Arjen > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/