X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720519FB333 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:07:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87990-07 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:07:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.logix-tt.com (mail.logix-tt.com [212.211.145.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23C09FB2AA for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:07:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (p549D25A1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.157.37.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215C4656B8 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04009185CD0DC for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:07:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44D72D11.7050203@logix-tt.com> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:07:45 +0200 From: Markus Schaber Organization: Logical Tracking and Tracing International AG, Switzerland User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060713) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig References: <7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B4E4D9B@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.185 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/66 X-Sequence-Number: 20251 Hi, Charles, Charles Sprickman wrote: > I've also got a 1U with a 9500SX-4 and 4 drives. I like how the 3Ware > card scales there - started with 2 drives and got "drive speed" > mirroring. Added two more and most of the bonnie numbers doubled. This > is not what I'm used to with the Adaptec SCSI junk. Well, for sequential reading, you should be able to get double drive speed on a 2-disk mirror with a good controller, as it can balance the reads among the drives. Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org