X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5912F9FB249 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:53:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11263-08 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:53:29 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from linda-4.paradise.net.nz (linda-4.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB34D9FA60C for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:53:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-4.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0J510005NUT3UP@linda-4.paradise.net.nz> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:53:27 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-46.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.46]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AFF74C06B for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:53:26 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:53:22 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Postgress memory leak with JBoss3.2.6 and large DB In-reply-to: <20060831095135.4292E9D7@dm17.mta.everyone.net> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <44FBA332.8020104@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060704) References: <20060831095135.4292E9D7@dm17.mta.everyone.net> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.027 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/16 X-Sequence-Number: 20702 Indika Maligaspe wrote: > Hey guys, > > We are running a Linux 2.4 enterprise edition box with 6GB of RAM, > **Postgres 8.0.3**. (snippage) > You might want to consider upgrading to 8.0.8 (see below), and seeing if the problem still persists. > As you can see the postmaster users are taking way over the memory that > should be taken. > > > If any of you can give us some pointers we would really appreciate that > and thanks in advance. > I notice that there are a number of fixes for memory leaks since 8.0.3 - 8.0.4 and 8.0.8 is where I see 'em specifically (reading release notes for 8.0.8). So you may be experiencing an issue that is fixed in the current 8.0 releases! I recommend upgrading to 8.0.8. You didn't say what your HW was, but if you are on a 32-bit platform, then a 2.4 kernel when you have >2G ram may leak noticeable amounts of memory itself... Cheers Mark