X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08B99FB203 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:44:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55041-03 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:44:52 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E459F9F47 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:44:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8H0inQq010039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:44:54 -0700 Message-ID: <450C9A80.2050708@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:44:48 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected References: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D42099AF@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> <20060917000843.GA16058@uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20060917000843.GA16058@uio.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:44:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.196 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/217 X-Sequence-Number: 20903 Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote: >> Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're >> talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB. > > Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range? No, they have databases in MPP that are that large :) Joshua D. Drake > > /* Steinar */ -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/