Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBA39FB462 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:37:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22125-01 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:37:03 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from linda-1.paradise.net.nz (linda-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.180]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EE99FB46D for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:37:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-1.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0J6Y00FV94DLY7@linda-1.paradise.net.nz> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:57 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-176.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.176]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA6793AFBA; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:56 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:39 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly? In-reply-to: <452C3C2D.6000008@paradise.net.nz> To: Mark Kirkwood Cc: "Jim C. Nasby" , Chris Browne , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <452C3C97.5060803@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061003) References: <45274A77.7080005@modgraph-usa.com> <18722.1160236300@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5f820f750610071850o6ed0b19o162d65d1987b2a8c@mail.gmail.com> <200610081605.03501.josh@agliodbs.com> <4529A0CA.8000904@modgraph-usa.com> <4529B6D0.2010206@paradise.net.nz> <4529B7E8.8080606@modgraph-usa.com> <604pud8ise.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> <20061009211827.GL72517@nasby.net> <452C3C2D.6000008@paradise.net.nz> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.036 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/214 X-Sequence-Number: 21343 Mark Kirkwood wrote: > who believe it is possible to build a "start enough" optimizer. > That's meant to read "smart enough" optimizer .. sorry.