Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:26:34 +1300
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
In-reply-to: <20061012163747.GG28647@nasby.net>
To: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "H.J. Sanders" <hjs@rmax.nl>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-id: <452EC11A.2030703@paradise.net.nz>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061003)
References: <GMEAJIDMNDKCIHMMHDFLEEOHEGAA.hjs@rmax.nl>
	<452E11FB.7070704@paradise.net.nz> <20061012135248.GS28647@nasby.net>
	<10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20061012163747.GG28647@nasby.net>

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> 
> Ok, now that I've actually looked at the release notes, I take that back
> and apologize. But while there's a lot of improvements that have been
> made, there's still some seriously tough problems that have been talked
> about for a long time and there's still no "light at the end of the
> tunnel", like how to handle multi-column statistics.

Yeah - multi-column stats and cost/stats for functions look the the next 
  feature additions we need to get going on....

Cheers

Mark