Message-ID: <4539969C.6070306@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:40:12 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
CC: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, alvherre@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
References: <ehbi15$2mhm$1@news.hub.org>	
	<20061021023211.GA20508@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<b42b73150610201950mc1f4163i67d3fdabb514befd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b42b73150610201950mc1f4163i67d3fdabb514befd@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver.  Lately it has been measured to be
>> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
>>
>> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng
> 
> just curious: what was the reasoning to reimplement the protocol stack
> in odbcng? the mainline odbc driver went in the other direction.

We wanted to be able to offer some options that we couldn't if based
around libpq.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> carlo: please, please, get your mail server to quit telling me your
> mailbox is full :)
> 
> merlin
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 


-- 

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate