Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA189FA4A7 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:02:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65097-01 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:02:24 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EFD9FA4D9 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:02:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9N328Mw002585; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:02:13 -0700 Message-ID: <453C30AE.10606@commandprompt.com> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:02:06 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bucky Jordan CC: Ben Suffolk , Dave Cramer , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: New hardware thoughts References: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4209D5A@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> In-Reply-To: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4209D5A@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.106 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL, SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Level: ** X-Archive-Number: 200610/469 X-Sequence-Number: 21598 >> If I get the offshelf LSI Megaraid withe the same configuration? You >> don't want to know... it will just make you want to cry at the fact > that >> you bought a Dell. > > I agree there's better platforms out there than Dell, but the above is > simply not true for the 2950. Raid 5, dd, on 6 disks, I get about > 260Mb/s sustained writes. Granted, this should be faster, but... it's a > far cry from 8 or 50MB/s. I posted some numbers here a while back on the > 2950, so you might want to dig those out of the archives. Well these are 3 year old machines, they could have improved a bit but it is quite true for the version of the Dells I have. I can duplicate it on both machines. Frankly Dell has a *long* way to go to prove to me that they are a quality vendor for Server hardware. Joshua D. Drake >