Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480369FA4C1 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:17:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46855-08 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:16:56 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from myemma.com (db1.e2ma.net [66.179.147.163]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD87B9FA4BC for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:16:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by myemma.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74BE23CFF; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:16:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from myemma.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (velma [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26493-05; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:16:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.23.39] (unknown [209.149.59.218]) by myemma.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509F223D01; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:16:58 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <459AD9D9.6090100@myemma.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:16:57 -0600 From: Erik Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Huxton Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) References: <459AD5A8.7030102@myemma.com> <459AD760.6090205@archonet.com> In-Reply-To: <459AD760.6090205@archonet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at myemma.com X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/29 X-Sequence-Number: 22630 Richard Huxton wrote: > Erik Jones wrote: >> Hmm... This gets stranger and stranger. When connecting to the >> database with the psql client in 8.2's bin directory and using >> commands such as \d the client hangs, or takes an extremely long >> time. If we connect to the same 8.2 database with a psql client from >> 8.1.4, both remotely and locally, \d responds immediately. Could the >> issue be with the client programs somehow? > > Couldn't be some DNS problems that only affect the 8.2 client I suppose? > Hmm... I don't see how that would matter when the 8.2. client is being run locally. -- erik jones software development emma(r)