Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85AB9FB666 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:50:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45856-10 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:50:12 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1069FB632 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:50:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1OKninD006962 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:49:50 -0800 Message-ID: <45E0A500.1010707@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:50:08 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geoffrey CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem References: <45DF3B15.1070609@3times25.net> <200702231330.57014.josh@agliodbs.com> <45DF5DA9.90002@commandprompt.com> <45DF6154.5090205@3times25.net> <1d4e0c10702231425ke37a732y36e241902fe0aa55@mail.gmail.com> <45DF94BF.6050904@3times25.net> In-Reply-To: <45DF94BF.6050904@3times25.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.5, clamav-milter version 0.88.5 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:49:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/273 X-Sequence-Number: 23327 Geoffrey wrote: > Guillaume Smet wrote: >> On 2/23/07, Geoffrey wrote: >>> As I've heard. We're headed for 8 as soon as possible, but until we get >>> our code ready, we're on 7.4.16. >> >> You should move to at least 8.1 and possibly 8.2. It's not a good idea >> to upgrade only to 8 IMHO. > > When I said 8, I meant whatever the latest greatest 8 is. Right now, > that looks like 8.2.3. No. The latest version of 8.2 is 8.2.3, there is also 8.1 which is at 8.1.8 and 8.0 which is at 8.0.12. They are all different *major* releases. IMO, nobody should be running anything less than 8.1.8. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/