Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA469FB972 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:48:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63188-06 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:48:40 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from mail.alteeve.com (unknown [192.139.81.120]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B119FB969 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:48:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.99] ([192.168.1.1]) by mail.alteeve.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l1QHltdv004004; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:47:56 -0500 Message-ID: <45E31D28.2020402@alteeve.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:47:20 -0500 From: Madison Kelly User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Stosberg CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB References: <45E30ADA.2050700@alteeve.com> <45E31300.4070701@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.102 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200702/305 X-Sequence-Number: 23359 Mark Stosberg wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Madison Kelly wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a >>> performance question. >>> >>> I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I >>> have only ever written very simple search engines before which amounted >>> to not much more that the query string being used with ILIKE on a pile >>> of columns. This was pretty rudimentary and didn't offer anything like >>> relevance sorting and such (I'd sort by result name, age or whatnot). >>> >>> So I am hoping some of you guys and gals might be able to point me >>> towards some resources or offer some tips or gotcha's before I get >>> started on this. I'd really like to come up with a more intelligent >>> search engine that doesn't take two minutes to return results. :) I >>> know, in the end good indexes and underlying hardware will be important, >>> but a sane as possible query structure helps to start with. >> See search.postgresql.org, you can download all source from >> gborg.postgresql.org. > > Joshua, > > What's the name of the project referred to? There's nothing named > "search" hosted on Gborg according to this project list: > > http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/projdisplaylist.php > > Madison, > > For small data sets and simpler searches, the approach you have been > using can be appropriate. You may just want to use a small tool in a > regular programming language to help build the query. I wrote such a > tool for Perl: > > http://search.cpan.org/~markstos/SQL-KeywordSearch-1.11/lib/SQL/KeywordSearch.pm > > For large or complex searches, a more specialized search system may be > appropriate. I suspect that's kind of tool that Joshua is referencing. > > Mark > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > Thanks Joshua and Mark! Joshua, I've been digging around the CVS (web) looking for the search engine code but so far have only found the reference (www.search) in 'general.php' but can't locate the file. You wouldn't happen to have a direct link would you? Mark, Thanks for a link to your module. I'll take a look at it's source and see how you work your magic. :) I think the more direct question I was trying to get at is "How do you build a 'relavence' search engine? One where results are returned/sorted by relevance of some sort?". At this point, the best I can think of, would be to perform multiple queries; first matching the whole search term, then the search term starting a row, then ending a row, then anywhere in a row and "scoring" the results based on which query they came out on. This seems terribly cumbersome (and probably slow, indexes be damned) though. I'm hoping there is a better way! :) Madi