Message-ID: <45E56A0B.1000903@postgresql.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:39:55 +0000
From: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB
References: <45E30ADA.2050700@alteeve.com>
	<Pine.OSX.4.64.0702261551070.289@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com>
	<20070227131558.GP12721@svr2.hagander.net>
	<45E4333B.9020008@postgresql.org> <20070228111611.GA7700@uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20070228111611.GA7700@uio.no>
OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:33:47PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> When we outgrow PostgreSQL & Tsearch2, then, well, we'll need to stop
>> pretending to be Google...
> 
> Just for the record: Google has been known to sponsor sites in need with
> Google Minis and such earlier -- I don't know what their[1] policy is on the
> matter, but if tsearch2 should at some point stop being usable for indexing
> postgresql.org, asking them might be worth a shot.

I think if postgresql.org outgrows tsearch2 then the preferred solution
would be to improve tsearch2/postgresql, but thanks for the tip :-)

> [1] Technically "our", as I start working there in July. 

Congratulations :-)

Regards, Dave