Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7949FBD82 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:20:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79230-06 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:20:47 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB8E9FBCDC for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:20:47 -0400 (AST) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so208247ana for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:20:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mR8Ncwn9JRiEIWjw4m0jxytw++wg/qYQjjHa1ve0dlnjxZ+oiHQjfLDLEJ+o1evEqZLgsEOxcN/4Z1K2jba3RQCnR1pDpYHomYZTGantoTN+uqryUAQyHr8jXzVzCBoC51s+FKGcnaeJTf//7R0O/qadPnSpRSo1FZiYXyRT8Ys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mnQDl7o/qcTAT24NCYx6ImM1mYR3HS0IJ/eiThfTl/1xdJTKwShz5/Q9yuK/8Z+4zX65ATMTeY6Z11CMJDicIKwTUFurPDgABFjlof1iF85Ed6yRJil1jT7MdkXbSoaXEmN1uf076OvVB//aebkcDsvm773aBmDfky0HezYdeFQ= Received: by 10.100.138.2 with SMTP id l2mr914989and.1172694046953; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [200.81.9.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h18sm1421471wxd.2007.02.28.12.20.45; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:20:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45E5E419.5050804@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:20:41 -0300 From: Rodrigo Gonzalez User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlos Moreno CC: PostgreSQL Performance Subject: Re: Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues References: <45E5B7D2.5020306@mochima.com> <5279.1172683250@sss.pgh.pa.us> <45E5D9D7.5090608@mochima.com> In-Reply-To: <45E5D9D7.5090608@mochima.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/346 X-Sequence-Number: 23400 Carlos Moreno wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Carlos Moreno writes: >> >> >>> I would have expected a mind-blowing increase in responsiveness and >>> overall performance. However, that's not the case --- if I didn't know >>> better, I'd probably tend to say that it is indeed the opposite >>> (performance seems to have deteriorated) >>> >> >> Did you remember to re-ANALYZE everything after loading up the new >> database? That's a frequent gotcha ... >> >> > > I had done it, even though I was under the impression that it wouldn't be > necessary with 8.2.x (I still chose to do it just in case). > > I've since discovered a problem that *may* be related to the deterioration > of the performance *now* --- but that still does not explain the machine > choking since last night, so any comments or tips are still most welcome. > > Thanks, > > Carlos > -- > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > And the problem that *may* be related is....? All the information is required so someone can give you good information...