Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B3F9FB733 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:23:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54909-05 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:23:31 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from www.3times25.net (duck.3times25.net [66.23.211.34]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6C09FB5FF for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:23:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.3times25.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043A55403B for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:23:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45EC19DD.6070508@3times25.net> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:23:41 -0500 From: Geoffrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem References: <45DF3B15.1070609@3times25.net> <200702231330.57014.josh@agliodbs.com> <45DF5DA9.90002@commandprompt.com> <45DF6154.5090205@3times25.net> <1d4e0c10702231425ke37a732y36e241902fe0aa55@mail.gmail.com> <45DF94BF.6050904@3times25.net> <45E0A500.1010707@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <45E0A500.1010707@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.056 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200703/86 X-Sequence-Number: 23491 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Geoffrey wrote: >> Guillaume Smet wrote: >>> On 2/23/07, Geoffrey wrote: >>>> As I've heard. We're headed for 8 as soon as possible, but until we get >>>> our code ready, we're on 7.4.16. >>> You should move to at least 8.1 and possibly 8.2. It's not a good idea >>> to upgrade only to 8 IMHO. >> When I said 8, I meant whatever the latest greatest 8 is. Right now, >> that looks like 8.2.3. > > No. The latest version of 8.2 is 8.2.3, there is also 8.1 which is at > 8.1.8 and 8.0 which is at 8.0.12. > > They are all different *major* releases. Yes I am aware of the various releases. My bad in that my reference to '8' was lazy and did not indicate the full release. Our intention is to move to the latest 8.2.* when we are able. > IMO, nobody should be running anything less than 8.1.8. Same old thing, time and money. Too busy bailing the boat to patch it right now... -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin