Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C88F9FA50C for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:46:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77708-02 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:45:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk (mail.metronet.co.uk [213.162.97.75]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1026D9FA2D8 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:45:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from server3.office.archonet.com (84-51-143-99.archon037.adsl.metronet.co.uk [84.51.143.99]) by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP id 8954714DA41; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:36:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (dell36.office.archonet.com [192.168.1.36]) by server3.office.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A34E27404B; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:36:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <46010A95.4010707@archonet.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:36:05 +0000 From: Richard Huxton User-Agent: IceDove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias Brox Cc: Joe Healy , Dan Harris , PostgreSQL Performance Subject: Re: OT: Munin (was Re: Determining server load from client) References: <460080A2.20800@drivefaster.net> <46008931.8060605@omc-international.com.au> <4600E13F.3070806@archonet.com> <20070321101340.GI10137@oppetid.no> In-Reply-To: <20070321101340.GI10137@oppetid.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200703/298 X-Sequence-Number: 23703 Tobias Brox wrote: > I have my postgres munin monitoring script at > http://oppetid.no/~tobixen/pg_activity.munin.txt (had to suffix it with > .txt to make the local apache happy). > > I would like to see what others have done as well. Well, I use Perl rather than shell, but that's just me. The main difference is that although I downloaded a couple of simple pg-monitoring scripts from the web, I've concentrated on monitoring the application(s) instead. Things like: - number of news items posted - searches run - logins, logouts The main limitation with it for me is the fixed 5-min time interval. It provides a slight irritation that I've got hourly/daily cron jobs that are being monitored continually. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd