Message-ID: <463B6BD7.7010308@laliluna.de>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 19:22:31 +0200
From: Sebastian Hennebrueder <usenet@laliluna.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
References: 
 <OFC96167D5.6BB63AC2-ON652572C9.003B5263-652572C9.003E4142@lntinfotech.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0705011647360.12033@asgard.lang.hm>
	<463B61ED.20409@laliluna.de> <200705041011.42313.josh@agliodbs.com>
In-Reply-To: <200705041011.42313.josh@agliodbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Josh Berkus schrieb:
> Sebastian,
>
>   
>> Before inventing a hyper tool, we might consider to provide 3-5 example
>> szenarios for common hardware configurations. This consumes less time
>> and be discussed and defined in a couple of days. This is of course not
>> the correct option for a brandnew 20 spindle Sata 10.000 Raid 10 system
>> but these are probably not the target for default configurations.
>>     
>
> That's been suggested a number of times, but some GUCs are really tied to the 
> *exact* amount of RAM you have available.  So I've never seen how "example 
> configurations" could help.
>
>   

I would define the szenario as
256 MB freely available for PostgresQL
=> setting x can be of size ...