Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A0A9FC0BA for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:46:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65367-02-2 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:46:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mx01.burntmail.com (mx01.burntmail.com [69.93.121.66]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A498B9FC037 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:46:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from pool-72-66-94-73.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.94.73] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx01.burntmail.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HwhbD-0001hU-Ac for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:46:07 -0500 Message-ID: <466987CD.7040408@burntmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:46:05 -0400 From: Guy Rouillier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: postgresql performance list Subject: Re: How much ram is too much References: <47A154B5-496C-478A-B60D-4238AF12EAC6@fastcrypt.com> In-Reply-To: <47A154B5-496C-478A-B60D-4238AF12EAC6@fastcrypt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000748-0, 06/07/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/157 X-Sequence-Number: 25190 Dave Cramer wrote: > Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other > systems in the server bottleneck ? What CPU and OS are you considering? -- Guy Rouillier