Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6889FB5DB
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:45:03 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 91967-03 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:44:43 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from nabagan.bluegap.ch (nabagan.bluegap.ch [88.198.58.248])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150B59FB4B5
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:44:49 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [192.168.0.232] (berlin.programmfabrik.de
	[::ffff:213.221.101.147])
	(AUTH: CRAM-MD5 markus@bluegap.ch, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3, 256bits,
	AES256-SHA)
	by nabagan.bluegap.ch with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:37:49 +0200
	id 00628D64.46702B6D.00000142
Message-ID: <46701EB7.8080208@bluegap.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:43:35 +0200
From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>
User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>
CC: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>,
	Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>, PFC <lists@peufeu.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: dbt2 NOTPM numbers
References: <466428F7.5010808@bluegap.ch> <46642B33.6030101@enterprisedb.com>	
	<46642F2E.3080509@bluegap.ch> <op.tteow6v7cigqcu@apollo13>	
	<46646065.50806@bluegap.ch>	
	<47BE2772-D774-4E2C-9D02-FD24C9F6BB90@decibel.org>	
	<466D6A9E.4010703@bluegap.ch> <466D6B8A.6030509@enterprisedb.com>	
	<466D6DD8.5060201@bluegap.ch>
	<70c01d1d0706130933p2a9a348coa4d3c3bbf607c65a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <70c01d1d0706130933p2a9a348coa4d3c3bbf607c65a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200706/241
X-Sequence-Number: 25274

Hi,

Mark Wong wrote:
> Yeah, I ran with 500+ warehouses, but I had 6 14-disk arrays of 15K
> RPM scsi drives and 6 dual-channel controllers... :)

Lucky you!

In the mean time, I've figured out that the box in question peaked at 
about 1450 NOTPMs with 120 warehouses with RAID 1+0. I'll try to compare 
again to RAID 6.

Is there any place where such results are collected?

Regards

Markus