Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C189FB890 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:23:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39144-05 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:23:49 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8919FB8B9 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:23:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5LNNj3F027001; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:23:46 -0700 Message-ID: <467B08C8.4040709@commandprompt.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:24:56 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Marlowe CC: Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access References: <4676DD57.7070304@metacarta.com> <20070620175300.GN30369@alvh.no-ip.org> <46796A08.8080601@metacarta.com> <200706201425.28557.sthomas@leapfrogonline.com> <46799C45.7080805@metacarta.com> <4679AE24.9070005@g2switchworks.com> <4679B6C7.3080207@metacarta.com> <467A9CE5.508@g2switchworks.com> <467AA77D.3030204@metacarta.com> <20070621171148.GC5500@phlogiston.dyndns.org> <467B0568.9040001@g2switchworks.com> In-Reply-To: <467B0568.9040001@g2switchworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.5, clamav-milter version 0.88.5 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:23:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/501 X-Sequence-Number: 25534 Scott Marlowe wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote: >> >>> I checked the disk picture - this is a RAID disk array with 6 drives, >>> with a bit more than 1Tbyte total storage. 15,000 RPM. It would be >>> hard to get more/faster disk than that. >>> >> >> What kind of RAID? It's _easy_ to get faster disk that 6 drives in >> RAID5, even if they're 15,000 RPM. The rotation speed is the least >> of your problems in many RAID implementations. >> > Also, the controller means a lot. I'd rather have a 4 disk RAID-10 with > an Areca card with BBU Cache than a 16 disk RAID 5 on an adaptec (with > or without cache... :) ) Oh come on... Adaptec makes a great skeet. Joshua D. Drake > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/