Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:48:42 -0400
From: "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
In-reply-to: <1184163398.16023.103.camel@phil.companeo.local>
To: Philippe Amelant <pamelant@companeo.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-id: <4694FBDA.7040900@sun.com>
Organization: Sun Microsystems
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
References: <20070709155954.1B20F78D85@fx8.security-mail.net>
	<1184163398.16023.103.camel@phil.companeo.local>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110)

Its hard to do direct comparison since that one used a different 
commercial application server than the PostgreSQL test.. As we do more 
tests with the help of the community, hopefully we can understand where 
the CPU cycles are spent and see how to make them more efficient...

Stay tuned!!

-Jignesh


Philippe Amelant wrote:
> am I wrong or DB2 9.1 is faster on less powerfull hardware ?
>
> Le lundi 09 juillet 2007 à 11:57 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah a écrit :
>   
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I think this result will be useful for performance discussions of 
>> postgresql against other databases.
>>
>> http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/
>>
>> More on Josh Berkus's blog:
>>
>> http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/postgresql-publishes-first-real-benchmark-17470
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jignesh
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>>     
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>